<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swirls &amp; Light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/</link>
	<description>Children&#039;s and YA Book Covers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:39:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L at Jacket Whys</title>
		<link>http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>L at Jacket Whys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/?p=124#comment-87</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t notice that! Didn&#039;t have the illustrators for all of them. But the styles certainly look similar.
So do you book designers have favorites for certain types of books? Are you wary of using the same illustrator too often?
GeriD - interesting you think of these as old fashioned! I don&#039;t think that of these four, but the ones in my &quot;Sketchy&quot; post definitely seem old fashioned to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t notice that! Didn&#8217;t have the illustrators for all of them. But the styles certainly look similar.<br />
So do you book designers have favorites for certain types of books? Are you wary of using the same illustrator too often?<br />
GeriD &#8211; interesting you think of these as old fashioned! I don&#8217;t think that of these four, but the ones in my &#8220;Sketchy&#8221; post definitely seem old fashioned to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cw</title>
		<link>http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Cw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/?p=124#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Also notice that 2 of these jackets are done by the same illustrator. Another trend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also notice that 2 of these jackets are done by the same illustrator. Another trend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Willow</title>
		<link>http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Willow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/?p=124#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Of these, the first two really pop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of these, the first two really pop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Stiefvater</title>
		<link>http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Stiefvater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/?p=124#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I usually associate illustrated covers with MG and photographic with YA. I can&#039;t say I can see MG books ever letting go of illustration in favor of photographs -- there&#039;s just something that says &quot;kid, buy me!&quot; about illustrated books. 

That said, my YA cover is being illustrated, so now I&#039;m all nervous. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually associate illustrated covers with MG and photographic with YA. I can&#8217;t say I can see MG books ever letting go of illustration in favor of photographs &#8212; there&#8217;s just something that says &#8220;kid, buy me!&#8221; about illustrated books. </p>
<p>That said, my YA cover is being illustrated, so now I&#8217;m all nervous. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeriD</title>
		<link>http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/swirls-light/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>GeriD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacketwhys.wordpress.com/?p=124#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, L.  When I look at illustrated covers, I immediately think &quot;old fashioned.&quot;  Which is strange, because I love illustrated covers, especially for SF and Fantasy novels.  We just went to a SF/Fantasy convention and the art show was my favorite place to hang out.  I enjoyed looking closely at all those paintings of pulp covers from the 50&#039;s, 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s.  Yet, when I see a painted cover for a YA book, I think, &quot;meh.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, L.  When I look at illustrated covers, I immediately think &#8220;old fashioned.&#8221;  Which is strange, because I love illustrated covers, especially for SF and Fantasy novels.  We just went to a SF/Fantasy convention and the art show was my favorite place to hang out.  I enjoyed looking closely at all those paintings of pulp covers from the 50&#8217;s, 60&#8217;s and 70&#8217;s.  Yet, when I see a painted cover for a YA book, I think, &#8220;meh.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
